The entire affiliate marketing community is currently discussing a scandal involving Dragon Money casino and its refusal to process a player's withdrawal.

What happened?

The player's version: A woman had been playing at the casino for two months. At one point, she deposited 92K USDT and increased her balance to 102K before deciding to withdraw the money. However, casino support refused to process the withdrawal and blocked her account. Initially, the casino cited a 3x wagering requirement stated in its terms and conditions. Later, however, it changed its explanation and accused the woman of cryptocurrency money laundering.

The casino's version: The 92K USDT originally belonged to the owner of the RolfPay project. According to the casino, the funds used for gambling had been stolen from the project's accounts. RolfPay's finance manager allegedly withdrew $144K, of which $92K was transferred to his girlfriend's account. The casino also claims that competitors are behind the public controversy surrounding the case.

The affiliate marketing community generally seems to lean toward the player's version. Members of the community believe Dragon Money may be deliberately presenting large amounts of irrelevant evidence and changing its explanations to confuse the audience and avoid paying out the player's balance.

The entire affiliate marketing community is currently discussing a scandal involving Dragon Money casino and its refusal to process a player's withdrawal.

What happened?

The player's version: A woman had been playing at the casino for two months. At one point, she deposited 92K USDT and increased her balance to 102K before deciding to withdraw the money. However, casino support refused to process the withdrawal and blocked her account. Initially, the casino cited a 3x wagering requirement stated in its terms and conditions. Later, however, it changed its explanation and accused the woman of cryptocurrency money laundering.

The casino's version: The 92K USDT originally belonged to the owner of the RolfPay project. According to the casino, the funds used for gambling had been stolen from the project's accounts. RolfPay's finance manager allegedly withdrew $144K, of which $92K was transferred to his girlfriend's account. The casino also claims that competitors are behind the public controversy surrounding the case.

The affiliate marketing community generally seems to lean toward the player's version. Members of the community believe Dragon Money may be deliberately presenting large amounts of irrelevant evidence and changing its explanations to confuse the audience and avoid paying out the player's balance.

The entire affiliate marketing community is currently discussing a scandal involving Dragon Money casino and its refusal to process a player's withdrawal.

What happened?

The player's version: A woman had been playing at the casino for two months. At one point, she deposited 92K USDT and increased her balance to 102K before deciding to withdraw the money. However, casino support refused to process the withdrawal and blocked her account. Initially, the casino cited a 3x wagering requirement stated in its terms and conditions. Later, however, it changed its explanation and accused the woman of cryptocurrency money laundering.

The casino's version: The 92K USDT originally belonged to the owner of the RolfPay project. According to the casino, the funds used for gambling had been stolen from the project's accounts. RolfPay's finance manager allegedly withdrew $144K, of which $92K was transferred to his girlfriend's account. The casino also claims that competitors are behind the public controversy surrounding the case.

The affiliate marketing community generally seems to lean toward the player's version. Members of the community believe Dragon Money may be deliberately presenting large amounts of irrelevant evidence and changing its explanations to confuse the audience and avoid paying out the player's balance.

The entire affiliate marketing community is currently discussing a scandal involving Dragon Money casino and its refusal to process a player's withdrawal.

What happened?

The player's version: A woman had been playing at the casino for two months. At one point, she deposited 92K USDT and increased her balance to 102K before deciding to withdraw the money. However, casino support refused to process the withdrawal and blocked her account. Initially, the casino cited a 3x wagering requirement stated in its terms and conditions. Later, however, it changed its explanation and accused the woman of cryptocurrency money laundering.

The casino's version: The 92K USDT originally belonged to the owner of the RolfPay project. According to the casino, the funds used for gambling had been stolen from the project's accounts. RolfPay's finance manager allegedly withdrew $144K, of which $92K was transferred to his girlfriend's account. The casino also claims that competitors are behind the public controversy surrounding the case.

The affiliate marketing community generally seems to lean toward the player's version. Members of the community believe Dragon Money may be deliberately presenting large amounts of irrelevant evidence and changing its explanations to confuse the audience and avoid paying out the player's balance.